Cisco VM-FEX Introduction Part 1

Posted in VM-FEX | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

UCS Generation 2 Hardware and UCSM 2.0

Posted in Product Updates | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

vSphere 5 new licensing model.

Up until now Cisco along with other vendors have been hugely driving up memory capacity while maintaining low CPU counts, Cisco’s Extended memory technology certainly gave them the edge in this space, however with greater DDR3 DIMM sizes ( 16GB now supported across all half width UCS M2 models) this advantage is not the differentiator it once was, as other vendors and non EMT Cisco UCS blades have now caught up or in some cases surpassed their EMT counterparts. There is still a case to be made about higher clock rates for Nehalem/Westmere EP processors over Nehalem EX and EMT memory real estate allowing greater capacities to be reached with smaller DIMM sizes perhaps.

One of the major reasons that platforms are increasingly featuring high memory / low CPU-count configurations is that it played right into the sweet spot of VMware’s VSphere 4 licensing model, in which licenses are based on number of sockets and number of cores on those sockets. However the licensing model of VSphere 5 now puts additional licensing requirements on larger memory capacities. More specifically vSphere 5 licenses are based on “vRAM:” the total amount of memory dedicated to each virtual machine,

For example A dual socket server with 256GB of RAM would under the new licensing model roughly double the cost of your VMware licensing.

VMware’s customers were so outraged at this licensing change that this week VMware announced a revised model (as shown below) which does significantly lessen the blow by doubling the amount of “Pre Tax” memory for Enterprise and Enterprise + licensing models

Below is a comparison of the previously announced and the new vSphere 5 vRAM entitlements per vSphere edition:

while I do not think VMware intentionally targeted the UCS it has the potential to be a major factor in customers buying decisions.

I think while VMware is still clearly the market leader and the “Hypervisor of choice” for Cisco UCS and Enterprise servers in general for that matter, this new licensing model will I’m sure put additional focus on alternative Hypervisors primarily Microsofts Hyper V , RedHat KVM and Citrix XEN.

Interestingly enough while writing this my memory is now recalling that UCS 2.0 (Capitola) due September has added additional functionality around RedHat KVM (specifically VM-FEX support, which essentially replaces the hypervisor switch with hardware switching on the UCS Fabric interconnects). Did Cisco see this coming and have decided to switch hypervisor allegiances, who knows.

Interesting times.

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Happy 2nd Birthday UCS

This month marks the 2nd birthday of Cisco UCS, 5400 customers and growing fast.
Happy birthday. and what a cool cake.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

UCS 2.0 (Capitola) Announced.

UCS 2.0 Features and Hardware

Hi All
Last week at Cisco Live Las Vegas, Cisco annouced the eagerly awaited UCS 2.0 (coded Capitola) for Q3 this year.
As well as a few expected software feature additions the big buzz is around the added Hardware thats is being release along side.

A New Fabric Interconnect: 6248UP
1U 48 Unified Ports (i.e. can run Ethernet or Fibre Channel depending on SFP inserted)

A New Fabric Extender: 2208XP
8 x 10Gb uplinks to Fabric Interconnect, 32 10Gb downlinks to servers.

A new Virtual Interface Card: 1280 Virtual Interface Card (VIC)
8 x 10 Gb traces to the mid-plane (4 x 10Gb Fabric A and 4 x 10Gb Fabric B)

It should be stressed that Cisco are saying no current UCS products are being “End of Lifed” the new hardware is an addition to the existing portfolio.
I am yet to see the prices of the new hardware as if they are comparable of course you are just going to buy the new product.

Looking forward to getting my hands on some in the lab, and putting them through the paces.

For a much more comprehensive write up on UCS 2.0 refer to the below blog by Sean McGee of Cisco

http://www.mseanmcgee.com/2011/07/ucs-2-0-cisco-stacks-the-deck-in-las-vegas/

Posted in Product Updates | Tagged , | 2 Comments

“UCS for my wife”

Sad though it is I was trying to convey the value of Cisco UCS to my wife, and in trying to find an analogy that she could relate to, and that would get the point across, I sketched out the attached diagram. Anyway she now appreciates the benefits of.

1. Less physical kit to power, cool and maintain
2. A unified device which if it fails you just replace it and all your recorded programs etc.. are not lost (Stateless)
3. It can store far more programs than any other comparable device (EMT)
4. Uses a unified cabling system to the TV (Unified Fabric / FCoE)
5. A single remote control that controls everything (UCSM)

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Upgrade proceedure from 1.3 to 1.4(1)m

Cisco UCS Upgrade from 1.3 to 1.4(1)m
Please see the below two links for the full step by step guide to performing the upgrade.

Part 1

Part 2

Posted in Upgrade | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

HP’s Response to UCS

http://h20338.www2.hp.com/enterprise/us/en/messaging/realstory-cisco-datacenter-view.html

Have a look at the above URL for an interesting and forthright view from HP on Cisco UCS.
Although a quick “find and replace” of boths vendors does bring back some memories.

July 2006 – The Blu-Ray marketing machine has been in full gear since early 2006 touting their first attempt at home video entertainment, the so called Blu-ray player. Now that Blu-ray, has been in the market for little over one year we thought it would be useful to take a closer look at the facts, separated from the marketing hyperbole.
While in theory Blu-ray players compete with the VHS systems, VHS’s leadership in the market has been validated by decades of innovation, real world experience and market leadership.

Please consider the following facts.
Fact 1: Blu-ray lacks the real world validation points that VHS delivers.
The market leadership and scale demonstrated by VHS far outpaces anything Blu-ray can muster and gives customers the peace of mind that is represented by this real world validation:
#1 in VCR’s: VHS has a commanding lead in the VCR market, with a 56.1% revenue share, and a 53.1% unit share. VHS has led the VCR market for 14 consecutive quarters. Blu-Ray has yet to break out of the “Others” category.i
2M+ VCR’s Shipped. VHS has shipped more than 2 Million VCR’S since 1979, shipping more than DVD and BLU-RAY COMBINED during this time.
3M+ VHS Tapes Shipped. 24% of all Tapes worldwide play on VHS systems Blu-ray claims 1 million of these new fangled and unproven “Discs” shipped.

This is not a dig at HP but simply shows that just because they are the market leader and currently have market dominance that does not mean that it should be the solution of choice going forward.
Fact is theres a new player (too early to say Sherriff) in town and that can only be a good thing for customers and to drive the technology where it needs to go.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

The 5 Karate Moves of Cisco UCS

In the same way that the Karate Kid only knew 5 Karate moves and was then immediately able to beat black belts and win a whole tournament, once you know the 5 “Moves” below you will know all the key UCS features and the value of the proposition.

1) Management

A single IP address to manage up to 320 servers including all network and storage elements of those servers.
This also means 1 management pane of glass via a single GUI (UCSM)

2) Unified Fabric (Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE))

This basically just means wrapping a Fibre channel frame in an Ethernet frame and transmitting it over same cabling.

Since the release of 10 Gigabit Ethernet it is now possible to accommodate “lossy” Ethernet and “lossless” Fibre Channel on the same medium.

This also required Cisco changing the rules of Ethernet with the inception of Cisco Data Centre Ethernet (DCE) submitted to the IEEE for standardisation who thought the name Data Centre Bridging (DCB)) sounded better.

Example: Take a VMware ESX host that requires 8 NICSs and two HBA’s making 10 physical connections. This same server when deployed on a Cisco UCS blade now has only 2! That equates to an 80% cabling reduction. On top of which adding additional NICS and HBAs is now a simple matter of mouse clicks, leading to what has been termed a “Wire once” deployment.

This significant cabling reduction leads to several other benefits including: Less server switch ports required which means less switches, more efficient cooling, and less power used (Gigabit Ethernet Cat 6 uses 8watts of power per end, FCoE twin-ax uses 0.1 watt per end)

3) Extended Memory Technology (EMT)

It is widely accepted that a CPUs optimal running efficiency is 60-70% but with the rapid evolution of CPUs and the ever increasing amount of cores and multi-threading capabilities per socket, most hosts, particularly VMware ESX hosts run out of RAM well before this point.

In an Intel Nahalem (XEON 5500) architecture, memory is directly associated per processor (socket). Each socket has 3 memory channels and each memory channel has access to 2 DDR3 DIMM slots this equals 6 DIMM slots per socket. Therefore a dual socket server can access a maximum of 12 DIMM slots and if using 16GB DIMMS the absolute maximum amount of RAM that can be installed is 192GB.

So how do you get more RAM? Well you need to add another CPU which in fact makes it even less efficient than before.

Enter EMT which allows a dual socket host access to a massive 384GB of RAM at higher Bus speeds (1066MHz compared to 800MHz)

How does Cisco manage this? Well as mentioned in chapter 3 Cisco UCS is a ground up development and as such Cisco by partnering with the likes of Intel and VMware could address a lot of these limitations and provide several optimisations.

Cisco realised that the maximum single DIMM that a BIOS could logically address is 32GB. and while at the time of writing (Q4 2010) 32GB DIMMs are still not readily commercially available, by developing the “Catalina” ASIC and placing it between the CPU and memory channels it was possible to in effect “RAID” 4 x 8GB physical DIMMs into 1 x 32GB logical DIMM. Thereby able to present 6 x 32GB logical DIMMs (192GB) to each socket this physically equates to 24 x 8GB DIMMs per socket on the system board making 48 DIMM sockets on a dual socket blade.

The Cisco “Catalina” ASICs sit between the DIMMs and the CPU which presents 24 x 8GB physical DIMMS as 6 x 32GB logical DIMMs per CPU (socket)

While the benefits detailed above are clear with regards to maximising memory there is another benefit to be had if there isn’t a requirement to max the memory to 384GB per blade. For example take the maximum amount of memory that can be installed in an HP blade server utilising dual Intel XEON 5500 processors:

Assuming £1000 for an 16GB DDR3 DIMM and £150 for a 4GB DIMM

HP DualXEON 5500 12 DIMM Slots using 16GB DIMMS = 192MB @ 800MHz = £12000
Cisco UCS B250 48 DIMM Slots using 4GB DIMMS = 192MB @ 1066MHz = £7200

As can be seen there are significant cost savings to be had by using a large number of low capacity DIMMs. This is only made possible by having 48 DIMM slots available with Cisco Extended Memory Technology compared to only 12 in a comparable HP server.

4) Virtualisation

Ground up built for virtualised environments, partnered with Intel and VMware on virtualisation optimisations. Virtualises I/O at BIOS level so O/S sees those resources as “Physical”

5) Statelessness

Blades or Compute nodes have no identity, identity is via service profiles. This means to replace a blade can take 15mins (as long as it takes to boot) all MACS, WWNs and UUIDs are only ever associated with a profile which can be detached and reattached to blades as required.

Example.
Historically if a server failed in the data centre the procedure would be to send an engineer in to investigate and if required replace the failed blade.

Obviously we don’t want to have to reconfigure other entities which may be linked to this particular MAC address, so the engineer would move the NIC cards from the failed unit to the replacement. Similarly we don’t want to have to involve the SAN team in having to re-zone the storage, so the engineer would move the HBAs from the failed unit to the replacement to ensure the WWPNs remain unchanged. Also there may be software licenses tied to the Universally Unique Identifier (UUID ) of the server.

All in all this server swap out could take several hours resulting in server downtime and engineer resource costs.

In a Cisco UCS environment this would be a simple matter of disassociating the service profile from the failed blade to a standby or replacement blade and then just power up the new blade.

As all MAC addresses, WWPNs, UUIDs, firmware revisions and settings are only ever associated with a service profile this new blade will be an exact match of the failed unit thus preserving all identity information.

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Welcome to UCSGuru, Your in depth source on Cisco UCS

This site is intended as a independent source for all things Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS)

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment